New Supreme Court Rulings Impacting TPS and Asylum: What It Means For You

By Wendy R. Barlow, Esq. | Partner at Cohen, Tucker + Ades Specializing in Complex Immigration Matters

The U.S. immigration landscape has just shifted dramatically. On June 25, 2026, the Supreme Court handed down two monumental decisions that significantly expand executive power regarding Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and border asylum restrictions.

At Cohen, Tucker + Ades, P.C., we know these swift changes can cause immense anxiety for families, workers, and individuals fighting to protect their legal status in the United States. Navigating federal litigation and deportation defense requires experienced advocates who understand how these rulings apply to individual cases. Below, our legal team breaks down exactly what the Supreme Court decided and how it impacts you.

1. The Supreme Court Ruling on TPS: Mullin v. Doe

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the administration has the legal authority to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) protections for hundreds of thousands of migrants.

What was decided?

The Court overturned previous lower-court orders that had blocked the termination of TPS. The ruling directly impacts approximately 350,000 Haitians and 4,000 Syrians, allowing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to move forward with winding down these protections.

Why it matters:

The administration argued that federal judges cannot second-guess immigration officials’ decisions regarding programs meant to be temporary. Consequently, this decision sets a precedent that could allow the swift termination of TPS for other countries, including Venezuela, Somalia, and Ethiopia.

2. Border Asylum Restrictions Upheld: Mullin v. Al Otro Lado

The second major ruling focused heavily on the mechanics of seeking asylum at the U.S. southern border, specifically addressing the practice known as “metering.”

What was decided?

The Supreme Court ruled that border enforcement officers can legally turn away or delay asylum seekers arriving by land at official ports of entry before they physically step onto U.S. soil.

The Court drew a strict legal line between individuals who are “arriving at” the border versus those who have “arrived in” the United States. Only those who have physically crossed the boundary line possess an immediate statutory right to be inspected and processed for asylum under federal law.

Key Takeaway: Future and current administrations now have a legal green light to expand restrictions that delay or prevent asylum seekers from accessing official land-based border crossings.

Frequently Asked Questions

To help you understand how these rulings might affect your specific situation, our NYC immigration attorneys have answered the most pressing questions below.

Can the government deport me if I currently have TPS?

Direct Answer: If you are a national of Haiti or Syria currently holding TPS, the Supreme Court’s ruling allows the government to begin the process of ending these protections. However, terminations do not happen overnight. It is crucial to consult with an immigration attorney immediately to review alternative pathways to legal status, such as family-based petitions, employment-based adjustments, or complex waivers.

Does the Supreme Court ruling eliminate all asylum rights?

Direct Answer: No, the Supreme Court did not eliminate the legal right to seek asylum. The ruling in Mullin v. Al Otro Lado specifically impacts individuals attempting to seek asylum at land-based ports of entry before they cross into U.S. territory. If you are already inside the United States, you still maintain the legal right to apply for affirmative or defensive asylum.

What should I do if my immigration status is at risk?

Direct Answer: You must act quickly to evaluate your legal options. Do not wait for an official notice to expire. A skilled crimmigration and deportation defense lawyer can audit your file to check if you qualify for post-conviction relief, adjustment of status, or specialized federal appeals before the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA).

How Cohen, Tucker + Ades Can Protect Your Future

Immigration laws are frequently described as second in complexity only to the Internal Revenue Code. When the highest court in the land alters the rules, having an aggressive, compassionate legal team in your corner is essential.

Since 1964, Cohen, Tucker + Ades, P.C. has served as a trusted advocate for individuals and families navigating the absolute toughest facets of U.S. immigration law. We specialize in:

• Deportation & Removal Defense: Formidable representation before immigration courts.

• Federal Litigation & Appeals: Drafting rigorous motions and briefs for the BIA and federal circuit courts.

• Crimmigration Analysis: Evaluating how criminal matters intersect with immigration status to defend against deportation.

• Complex USCIS Waivers: Navigating family-sponsored and employment pathways to secure permanent residency.

The American dream should be achievable for all who pursue it. Let us help you find clarity amid these changing federal rules.

Contact Our New York City Office Today

Don’t let fear paralyze you. Contact Cohen, Tucker + Ades, P.C. to schedule a comprehensive legal consultation.

Wendy R. Barlow, Esq.is a Partner at Cohen, Tucker + Ades, P.C. with nearly 20 years of experience in high-stakes immigration litigation. A graduate of the Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University, Wendy is admitted to practice in New York and New Jersey as well as before the U.S. Supreme Court and multiple Federal Circuit Courts. Wendy is recognized for her ability to handle cases that many consider insurmountable.

Disclaimer: This blog post contains general information and is for informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Cohen, Tucker + Ades P.C. Immigration laws and fee schedules are subject to frequent change. The information provided herein may not reflect the most current legal developments. You should not act or refrain from acting based on information contained in this post without seeking professional counsel from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. Cohen, Tucker + Ades P.C. expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this post.